No, next question
Exactly.
No. Not at all.
He can’t control our future if we throw him in jail.
And people forget we can just do that, historically it would even go down as a merciful revolution. Just throw all the oligarchs and billionaires in jail, and take all their money and redistribute that.
They’ll say “that’s not legal” but who honestly gives a flying fuck at this point what’s legal? Let em sit in jail and repeat over and over “this isn’t fair” for the rest of their natural lives.
We can just do it shirt brothers, the oligarchs decided theres no more rules, so why do we let rules hold us back?
At this point it’s an inevitability that it’s gonna come to that point, it’s just how much we put up with before it.
He can’t even control ChatGPT
No.
No, lol.
Can He Be Trusted?
Of course. As much as all these other narcissistic assholes. IMHO he is even more power greedy than the others, but that’s details.
Why is this so downvoted?
by writing articles like this they spark the wrong discussion. extreme analogy, sorry to folks who don’t do analogies: If there is a robber in a persons kitchen. Any discussion is a net negative for that homeowner. why? because the robbers presence alone is a violation of the sanctity of the home. Any and all solutions, start with the robber not being in the kitchen. Any and all discussion, adds _more time to the robber being in the kitchen All of which is a net loss for the homeowner, and potential gain for the robber.
These type’s of horserace articles encourage a type of busywork discussions that waste time because they lead many of those readers away from thinking about the real / pertinent discussions to have.
Because the question is extremely dumb (regardless of the content of the article).
