• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Five percent of the population is now dead or wounded. Sixty percent of them are women and children. Some 200,000 housing units have been completely destroyed,” he continued. “Every university in Gaza has been bombed. There is now imminent starvation taking place.”

    “So why you would invite somebody who has done such horrific things to the Palestinian people?” Sanders added. “I think it’s a very bad idea.”

    Thank you Bernie.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    “If Netanyahu comes to address Congress, I would be more than glad to show the ICC the way to the House floor to issue that warrant,” said Rep. Mark Pocan.

    classically based

  • S_204@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Free speech being stifled by the Liberals. They’re more and more like the far right every day.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “Freedom of Speech” is not “Freedom to get a free soapbox anywhere you feel like whenever you feel like”.

      In your version, anybody in the World has a right to address Congress whenever they feel like, in which case it should be first come first served and Netanyahu can join the line just everybody else (as giving priority to some would interfere in everybody else’s “Freedom”).

      • S_204@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        No one is saying free speech is giving the entire world a soapbox wherever they want .

        We’re talking about someone who has been invited by the speaker of the House to speak in front of Congress. This isn’t any random person on a soapbox. This is the speaker of the House of Representatives making an official US government invitation to an ally. Undermining that is absolutely stifling Free speech.

    • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not wanting people to speak before Congress is STIFLING FREE SPEECH but banning books, drag shows, certain religions in school, protests, pronouns, tribal modifiers and minority hairstyles is NOT!

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      So you think “free speech” means a foreign leader who is actively committing a genocide must be allowed to speak directly to Congress?

      Do you think Putin should be able to? What about NK or China’s leaders?

      How pissed are you when peaceful protesters are attacked by cops?

      Because that actually is a free speech issue. But no one is entitled to give a speech to Congress.